Question(s) of the day: Meth pseudo claims go unchallenged ... unless you're opposed to Rx mandate

coldmedicineflag20111121

Why is it that if you support the proposed mandate in Frankfort prohibiting law-abiding Kentuckians from purchasing a box of Sudafed without a prescription that you can saw whatever you want, quote whatever misleading facts you want and enjoy having your claims go largely unchallenged by the (Louisville) Courier-Journal and Lexington Herald-Leader?

Why is it that if you oppose the prescription mandate, you are considered a drug-company shill, all of your data is questioned vociferously and you are basically put on trial and cross-examined, as opponents were when they were finally allowed to address the Senate Judiciary Committee on Jan. 19 -- a full week after supporters of liberty and freedom were not even allowed to speak?